'Ministers' conversations of 'national interest' should be documented' | Israel | Jerusalem Post
RSS | Blogs | Iran news  12 Tevet 5769, Thursday, January 8, 2009 8:37 IST |
WebJPost.com 
HomeHeadlinesIranian ThreatJewish WorldOpinionBusinessReal EstateLocal IsraelBlogsArts & Culture Français Classifieds
IsraelMiddle EastInternationalHealth & Sci-TechFeaturesTravelCafe OlehMagazineSportsIsrael Guide Русский
Product of the week
Specials
Eldan Rent a Car
Israel's leading car rental company offers a 20% discount on all online reservations
The Best Jewish Charity
Learn how Efrat saved 30,000 lives of Jewish children
Israeli Basketball
Watch Live Israeli Premier Basketball Games
Tamir Rent a car
Car rental in Israel, special prices
Find love at JChuppah.com
Use your mouse to find your spouse!
Israel guide
Your guide to Israel
Green Israel
Protecting Israel's environment
The future of music
Global community of music makers discover new music
Jerusalem Gold Hotel
Your Home in Jerusalem Pay 6 Stay 7 days
JPost.com » Israel » Article

'Ministers' conversations of 'national interest' should be documented'


PrintSubscribe
Toolbar
Share article:
What's this?
Decrease text size Decrease text size
Increase text size Increase text size

Conversations with massive implications for the nation, including the decision to go to war, are conducted without any official documentation, Meretz MK Zehava Gal-On complained on Thursday.

Meretz MK Zehava Gal-On.

Meretz MK Zehava Gal-On.
Photo: Ariel Jerozolimski [file]

She was discussing her proposal to tighten the record keeping by cabinet members, including the prime minister.

Gal-On and fellow Meretz lawmaker Ran Cohen are waiting for a new government to be installed before introducing a bill that would force cabinet ministers to document all of their conversations that involve the "national interest."

The impetus for the bill, she said, came from the findings of the Winograd Committee on decision-making in the Second Lebanon War. The committee found that there was no documentation for at least two key conversations - one between Prime Minister Ehud Olmert and then-chief of General Staff Lt.-Gen. Dan Halutz on July 12, 2006, in which they decided to go to war, and another between Olmert and Foreign Minister Tzipi Livni in which Livni later claimed that she opposed IDF ground operations in Lebanon.

In both cases, the Winograd Committee was forced to rely on "he-said, she-said" testimony, as no protocols or transcripts were ever prepared.

Gal-On seeks to put an end to this situation. Her proposal would add two clauses to the Government Law of 2001. The first would require that "if an oral discussion is held between ministers on topics of critical interest to Israel, all of the sides will file reports to the cabinet secretary that will be passed on every three months to the attorney-general."

The second clause stresses that it is "the responsibility of the Prime Minister's Office to write protocols of all of his official conversations" and that those protocols will be passed once every three months to the Attorney-General's Office.

The bill would also mandate stringent criteria as to who is allowed to request copies of the reports, and Gal-On said these might include investigative bodies like the Winograd Committee or the State Comptroller's Office.

Gal-On said that in the past, even prime minister Golda Meir's informal "kitchen cabinet" had taken care to write protocols of its discussions and decisions, but that in recent years, the habit had fallen by the wayside.

Gal-On requested - and received - a report from the Government Research Department comparing documentation procedures in the United States and Great Britain.

In the US, the report said, the White House Communications Agency was responsible for all of the communications of the president and vice president, both domestically and when overseas. The agency, which was founded under president Franklin Roosevelt in 1942, receives its budget from the Pentagon but is not under the defense establishment's direct authority. Although many details of its operation are kept under cover, it is known that at least until 1989, the Communications Agency recorded all of the US president's conversations, both face-to-face and over the telephone. Although officially only important conversations were recorded, the Government Research Department report says that archival evidence indicates that many additional conversations were recorded as well.

PrintSubscribe
Toolbar
+ Recommend:
del.icio.us reddit newsvine facebook
What's this?
Philanthropy Guide
JWStore
Bank hapoalim
eTeacher
KKL Picture of the week
Jerusalem Gold Hotel
Got a Question?
Have a question about something in this story? Ask it here and get answers from other users like you.

 
 
© 1995 - 2009 The Jerusalem Post. All rights reserved.    About Us | Media Kit | Exclusive Content | Advertise with Us | Subscribe | Contact Us | RSS
The online edition of The Jerusalem Post – JPost.com – provides first class news and analysis about Israel, the Middle East and the Jewish world. Whether news about Iran, Gaza, Syria, Fatah, Hamas or Hezbollah, JPost.com covers the burning issues of the Middle East and the Israeli-Arab conflict.