Today's Citizen
David Warren . Common enemies
David Warren, The Ottawa Citizen
Published: Wednesday, May 14, 2008Will Israel last another 60 years? Will Canada? Will the West? I believe the questions are closely related, and will begin by giving two quick answers.
The first is, "I don't know." Attempts to predict the future from the historical past have a track record around zero, and while it is true that history is constantly repeating itself, it is able to repeat itself in many different ways. On the present leadership performance of Israel's complacent, incompetent, and probably corrupt prime minister - and in view of the assembling forces dedicated to the country's annihilation - one might reasonably say that Israel will be lucky to reach three score and ten. But as I've myself frequently argued, all trends are reversible.
The second is: "It depends what you mean by survive." If the world is still here - and let's not take anything for granted - there is likely to be a little patch of land corresponding to that upon which Israel now sits. And if there are still Jews, it will still belong in their hearts, as it has done for millennia. It is not inconceivable to me that Israel might be annihilated, or nearly annihilated, and then restored. Such events are compatible with very large, planetary wars. They hardly bear thinking about.
But I insist that Israel's survival is tied to that of the West. She is our front line, an embodiment of unambiguously western values. The enemies we have are common enemies - left-fascist ideology (formerly expressed as Communism), and Islamofascist ideology (now called "Islamism," to distinguish political from religious Islam, on the assumption that this can be done).
These are the two great contemporary Sirens, and each calls upon constituencies lodged deep in the West itself. The appeal of simplistic ideological movements spreads in the spiritual vacuum left by the recession of Christianity.
But whatever dark forces answer to the command of these two great Sirens, there is agreement between the left and the Islamists that Israel is the front line of the West, and that she is sufficiently isolated to be worth destroying first. There is moreover agreement between them that the ultimate target is "Amerika" and the whole "bourgeois, Judeo-Christian" order that has sustained our freedom and prosperity.
What happens if our enemies succeed? I would guess it is then Green versus Green, and the Islamist monster eats the Environmentalist monster, for the former is more wilful and ruthless.
I risk being misunderstood at this point, for I am not exactly equating Osama bin Laden with Al Gore. Environmentalism, and the current "global warming" hysteria, is only a flag of convenience, just as the "class war" served the left in a previous generation, and there are many alternative flags. Its root cause is a Gnostic, religious atheism: it forms and disperses and reforms like the mist. Whereas, Islamism is a unified and cogent force, with an instinctive recourse to violence.
To understand what I mean, the reader must consider almost any contemporary university campus, in which the radical political causes are quite various, but there is general agreement among radicals on each other's agendas. That one must attack Zionist Israel, and conversely champion oppressed Palestinians, is something every little half-educated campus ideologue knows he can take for granted.









































